Skip to Navigation
The Collaborative Clearinghouse for Lawsuits and Other Claims Against ACE Group Insurance Companies

SUNSHINE MILLS, INC v. ILLINOIS UNION INSURANCE COMPANY et al Denial Letter

ATTENTION: It is possible that this information may no longer be current and therefore may be inaccurate. The index contains both open and closed cases and is not a complete list of cases in which an ACE Insurance Group company is involved. This information is provided to give interested persons an idea of the issues disputed in the indexed cases. For a full understanding of a case, one should read the rest of the court file, including the response. For the most up-to-date and complete information on a case, visit www.pacer.gov or contact the clerk of the relevant court.

Embedded Scribd iPaper - Requires Javascript and Flash Player
Case 3:11-cv-03079-AKK Document 1-2
Filed 08/22/11 Page 1 of 3
FILED
2011 Aug-23 AM 10:44 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA
EXHIBIT 2
Case 3:11-cv-03079-AKK Document 1-2
Filed 08/22/11 Page 2 of 3
1-646-458-6992 tel michael.fried@acegroup.com www.ace-ina.com
U
Via e-mail July 27, 2010 Kenneth Thompson, Esq. CDC Software, Inc. Two Concourse Parkway, Suite 800 Atlanta, GA 30328 Re: Insured: Claimant: Claim No.: Policy No.: CDC Software Sunshine Mills JY09J0319682 EON G21662951 005
ACE USA Professional Risk Claims
Michael P. Fried
Assistant Vice President
Dear Mr. Thompson: As you know, this matter was recently transferred to the undersigned for handling. At the outset, ACE has not made any determination as to the validity of the above-referenced matter, nor do we assert that any liability exists. Based upon the information recently received from CDC Software, we regret to inform you that there is no coverage for this loss. SUMMARY OF CLAIM It appears that Sunshine Mills entered into a contract to license the use of Ross Systems software and is dissatisfied with the program. They allege that many misrepresentations were made with respect to the sale of the product. It appears that Sunshine Mills seeks compensatory damages as well as consequential damages. THE POLICY Based upon the information provided to us, ACE set this matter up under the December 15, 2008 to December 15, 2009 policy. Based on recently acquired information, the appropriate policy to respond to this loss would be the ACE Advantage Digital Technology & Professional Liability Insurance Policy that was issued to CDC Software and was effective for the Policy period of December 15, 2007 to December 15, 2008. The policy provides Limits of Liability of $10,000,000 for each claim and in the aggregate. Coverage is afforded under the Insuring Agreements which provide: I. Insuring Agreements A. Technology and Internet Errors and Omissions Liability If Insuring Agreement A, Technology and Internet Errors and Omissions Liability coverage, is purchased pursuant to Item 3 of the Declarations, the Insurer will pay Damages and Claims Expenses of the Insured which the Insured becomes legally obligated to pay by reason of a Claim first made against the Insured during the Policy Period and reported to the Insurer pursuant to Section VIII, Notice, for any Wrongful Acts taking place after the Retroactive Date and prior to the end of the Policy Period. The Notice provision states, in pertinent part… The Insured shall, as a condition precedent to their rights under this Policy, give to the Insurer written notice of any Claim as soon as practicable, but in no event later than 30 days after the later of the end of the Policy Period, the Automatic Extended Reporting Period, or, if elected, the Optional Extended Reporting Period. Policy Period is defined as… A.
Case 3:11-cv-03079-AKK Document 1-2
Filed 08/22/11 Page 3 of 3
U
A. Policy Period means the period of time specified in Item 2 of the Declarations [i.e. December 15, 2007 to December 15, 2008], subject to prior termination pursuant to Section XIII, Termination of the Policy. We note from the materials forwarded to our attention that the claim was filed April 29, 2008. We further note that Ross Systems’ answer was filed electronically with the court on July 8, 2008. For this matter to have been timely reported it would have had to been reported during the policy during which the claim was made, that is to say, the December 15, 2007 to December 15, 2008 policy period and would have to have been reported no later than January 15, 2009. Our records reflect that this matter was reported to ACE via email and with only a précis of the litigation and no supporting documents on August 11, 2009. Because this matter was reported nearly seven months after the time to which report this claim expired, there can be no coverage under the policy. As such, ACE can take no further action with respect to this loss. ACE reserves the right to deny coverage based upon other grounds and to supplement and/or amend this letter to address additional coverage issues as they may arise. Nothing stated herein and no further action taken by ACE or on its behalf should be construed as a waiver of any of its rights under the Policy. On the contrary, by providing this or any prior correspondence to the Insured, engaging in any prior or future discussions with the Insured, or paying or agreeing to pay any amount to or on or behalf of the Insured, ACE does not waive any rights that it has under the Policy at law or in equity and understands the Insured reserves its rights as well. Should you have any questions, please contact me directly at (646) 458-6992 or via email at michael.fried@acegroup.com. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours,
Michael P. Fried Assistant Vice President Copies to: John McLaughlin - Marsh
Page 2/2

Published under a Creative Commons License By attribution, non-commercial
AttachmentSize
Sunshine Mills, Inc v. Illinois Union Insurance Company et al. Denial Letter.pdf48.64 KB

Like us on facebook!