Skip to Navigation
The Collaborative Clearinghouse for Lawsuits and Other Claims Against ACE Group Insurance Companies


ATTENTION: It is possible that this information may no longer be current and therefore may be inaccurate. The index contains both open and closed cases and is not a complete list of cases in which an ACE Insurance Group company is involved. This information is provided to give interested persons an idea of the issues disputed in the indexed cases. For a full understanding of a case, one should read the rest of the court file, including the response. For the most up-to-date and complete information on a case, visit or contact the clerk of the relevant court.

Case Number: 
1:12-cv-00524- Search Pacer
ACE Group party(s): 
Opposing Party: 
Charles Wolfe
Court Type: 
US District Court: 
Northern District of Georgia
Date Filed: 
Feb 17 2012


7. Defendant hired Plaintiff as an Insurance Agent in September of 1981.

8. Plaintiff was employed with Defendant for over thirty (30) years.

9. Plaintiff noticed that he was being singled out for certain behavior that younger workers were not singled out for.

10. Not only was the Plaintiff singled out, Defendant started writing up the Plaintiff as well.

11. On or about November 17, 2010, George Elmer told the Plaintiff that if he did not retire he would be terminated.

12. The Plaintiff was forced to retire after thirty (30) years of service and the Defendant denied Plaintiff a severance package.

13. After Defendant terminated the Plaintiff, Defendant hired a younger worker to assume the Plaintiff’s job duties.

(Age Discrimination)

14. Plaintiff reincorporates the above allegations herein by reference.

15. Plaintiff’s claims have been pending with the EEOC more than 60 days. (See attached Charge of Discrimination)

16. Plaintiff has met all jurisdictional prerequisites to filing his Age Discrimination claim.

17. Defendant is Plaintiff’s “employer” as that term is defined under 29 U.S.C. § 623.

18. At the time of Defendants’ decision to terminate the Plaintiff’ he was 62 years old.

19. Defendants’ discrimination was willful and intentional and has directly caused Plaintiff damages, including costs and attorneys fees, in an amount to be determined at trial."

The provided text is an excerpt from a document filed in this case. For a full understanding of the case, one should read the complete court file, including the response.

Javascript is required to view this map.