Skip to Navigation
The Collaborative Clearinghouse for Lawsuits and Other Claims Against ACE Group Insurance Companies

WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY v. URATA & SONS CEMENT, INC. et al

ATTENTION: It is possible that this information may no longer be current and therefore may be inaccurate. The index contains both open and closed cases and is not a complete list of cases in which an ACE Insurance Group company is involved. This information is provided to give interested persons an idea of the issues disputed in the indexed cases. For a full understanding of a case, one should read the rest of the court file, including the response. For the most up-to-date and complete information on a case, visit www.pacer.gov or contact the clerk of the relevant court.

Case Number: 
4:11-cv-02438 Search Pacer
ACE Group party(s): 
Opposing Party: 
Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company
Court Type: 
Federal
US District Court: 
Northern District of California
Date Filed: 
May 19 2011

"A. A Declaration that WSLIC owes no duty to indemnify Bosa or Urata under the Urata Policy for the claims asserted in the Liburd Complaint, because coverage for those claims is excluded by the Wrap-Up Exclusion contained in the Urata Policy.

B. A Declaration that WSLIC owes no duty to defend Bosa or Urata under the Urata Policy for the Liburd Complaint, because the claims in the Liburd Complaint are excluded by the Wrap-Up exclusion in the Urata Policy.

C. A Declaration that WSLIC owes no duty to defend or indemnify Bosa, because Bosa is not an "insured" under the Urata Policy

D. Supplementary Payments provisions in the Urata policy because Bosa does not qualify as an "indemnitee" and because one or more of the conditions set forth in the Supplementary Paments provisions have not been, and cannot be, met."

The provided text is an excerpt from a document filed in this case. For a full understanding of the case, one should read the complete court file, including the response.

Javascript is required to view this map.