Skip to Navigation
The Collaborative Clearinghouse for Lawsuits and Other Claims Against ACE Group Insurance Companies

HARRELL AND OWENS FARM v. FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE CORPORATION et al

ATTENTION: It is possible that this information may no longer be current and therefore may be inaccurate. The index contains both open and closed cases and is not a complete list of cases in which an ACE Insurance Group company is involved. This information is provided to give interested persons an idea of the issues disputed in the indexed cases. For a full understanding of a case, one should read the rest of the court file, including the response. For the most up-to-date and complete information on a case, visit www.pacer.gov or contact the clerk of the relevant court.

Case Number: 
4:09-cv-00217 Search Pacer
Opposing Party: 
Harrell and Owens Farm
Court Type: 
Federal
US District Court: 
Eastern District of North Carolina
Date Filed: 
Dec 23 2009

"20. In 2005 Harrell Owens began participating in a FCIC pilot program designed to offer insurance coverage to farmers for their sweet potato production. As part of that program, Harrell Owens purchased insurance policies written by ACE and reinsured by RMA. These polices insured a certain level of sweet potato production, namely 75% of Harrell Owens’s average yield for the insured acreage.
21. Harrell Owens and the Defendants dispute the manner in which ACE settled claims Harrell Owens made under its 2006 and 2008 Multiple Peril Crop Insurance Policies, Nos. MP-0017748 and MP-0647564, respectively (the “Crop Policies,” or, with respect to a particular year, the “Crop Policy”). The language of the 2006 and 2008 Crop Policies is the same with respect to matters pertinent to this action."

The provided text is an excerpt from a document filed in this case. For a full understanding of the case, one should read the complete court file, including the response.

Javascript is required to view this map.