Skip to Navigation
The Collaborative Clearinghouse for Lawsuits and Other Claims Against ACE Group Insurance Companies


ATTENTION: It is possible that this information may no longer be current and therefore may be inaccurate. The index contains both open and closed cases and is not a complete list of cases in which an ACE Insurance Group company is involved. This information is provided to give interested persons an idea of the issues disputed in the indexed cases. For a full understanding of a case, one should read the rest of the court file, including the response. For the most up-to-date and complete information on a case, visit or contact the clerk of the relevant court.

Case Number: 
5:11-cv-00455 Search Pacer
ACE Group party(s): 
Opposing Party: 
David A. Gauntlett
Court Type: 
US District Court: 
Northern District of California
Date Filed: 
Jan 28 2011

"1. This is an insurance coverage suit seeking to establish that Defendant Illinois Union Insurance Company ("Illinois Union") had a duty to defend Plaintiff David A. Gauntlett d/b/a Gauntlett & Associates. ("G&A") in the underlying litigation styled as Tarzi v. Gauntlett & Associates, et al., Consolidated Superior Courts of California, County of Orange, Central District, Case No. 07-CC-08999 (the "Tarzi action"), and that Illinois Union must reimburse G&A for all defense expenses incurred therein."

The provided text is an excerpt from a document filed in this case. For a full understanding of the case, one should read the complete court file, including the response.

Javascript is required to view this map.