Skip to Navigation
The Collaborative Clearinghouse for Lawsuits and Other Claims Against ACE Group Insurance Companies


ATTENTION: It is possible that this information may no longer be current and therefore may be inaccurate. The index contains both open and closed cases and is not a complete list of cases in which an ACE Insurance Group company is involved. This information is provided to give interested persons an idea of the issues disputed in the indexed cases. For a full understanding of a case, one should read the rest of the court file, including the response. For the most up-to-date and complete information on a case, visit or contact the clerk of the relevant court.

Case Number: 
3:10-cv-00580 Search Pacer
Opposing Party: 
Michael Ellis
Court Type: 
US District Court: 
Southern District of Mississippi
Date Filed: 
Oct 18 2010

"18. On or about June 13, 2005, Plaintiff made two claims for workers' compensation benefits by :filing the proper paperwork called Petitions to Controvert with the Mississippi Workers' Compensation Commission. Defendants denied any payment on both claims without arguable basis.
19. OnJune 10,2005, Defendant Baker signed a Notice of Controversion for both claims and stated "lack of sufficient information" as basis for the denial and cited investigation as "ongoing." Said notice is hereby attached as Exhibit "B."
20. On November 8, 2006, claimant's counsel, John Satcher, took the deposition of Dr. Aremmia Tanious, and Defendant Baker was present on behalf of all Defendants. In response to multiple questions posed by Mr. Satcher and Defendant Baker, Dr. Tanious opined that Plaintiffs injury was work-related, and that continued treatment was reasonable, related and medically necessary. However, Defendants failed to pay Plaintiff any benefits or provide treatment."

The provided text is an excerpt from a document filed in this case. For a full understanding of the case, one should read the complete court file, including the response.

Javascript is required to view this map.