Skip to Navigation
The Collaborative Clearinghouse for Lawsuits and Other Claims Against ACE Group Insurance Companies


ATTENTION: It is possible that this information may no longer be current and therefore may be inaccurate. The index contains both open and closed cases and is not a complete list of cases in which an ACE Insurance Group company is involved. This information is provided to give interested persons an idea of the issues disputed in the indexed cases. For a full understanding of a case, one should read the rest of the court file, including the response. For the most up-to-date and complete information on a case, visit or contact the clerk of the relevant court.

Case Number: 
2:11-cv-00177 Search Pacer
ACE Group party(s): 
Opposing Party: 
Ace American Insurance Company
Court Type: 
US District Court: 
Southern District of Mississippi
Date Filed: 
Aug 25 2011

26. Paragraphs 1 through 25 are incorporated by reference.

27. For one or more of the reasons stated above, ACE has no obligation to indemnify Langley pursuant to the Policy for the allegations in the underlying lawsuit styled Cause No. 2011-
31-CV3; Brittany Davis vs. Michael W. Langley, Key Energy Services, LLC and John Does 1-5.

28. The Plaintiff, Davis, in the underlying lawsuit has no separate rights under the Policy either as an Insured or as a third party beneficiary, and Davis should be bound by this Court's judgment regarding ACE's obligations, if any, to Langley.

29. ACE seeks a declaratory judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 for the purposes of determining a question of actual controversy between the parties, that the defenses to coverage pleaded herein preclude any obligation of ACE to indemnify or in any other way provide coverage to Michael W. Langley, a defendant in the underlying lawsuit."

The provided text is an excerpt from a document filed in this case. For a full understanding of the case, one should read the complete court file, including the response.

Javascript is required to view this map.